<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Judebert.com (Entries tagged as uml)</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/</link>
    <description>Progress Report</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:judebert@judebert.com" />
    <generator>Serendipity 1.6.2 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>judebert@judebert.com</managingEditor>

    

<item>
    <title>Rating UML Editors: Open ModelSphere</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/358-Rating-UML-Editors-Open-ModelSphere.html</link>
            <category>Programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/358-Rating-UML-Editors-Open-ModelSphere.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://judebert.com/progress/wfwcomment.php?cid=358</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://judebert.com/progress/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=358</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>judebert@judebert.com (Judebert)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a  class=&#039;serendipity_image_link&#039;  rel=&#039;lightbox[lightbox_group_entry_358]&#039; href=&#039;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/OpenModelSphere.png&#039;&gt;&lt;!-- s9ymdb:926 --&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;serendipity_image_left&quot; width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;106&quot; style=&quot;float: left; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; src=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/OpenModelSphere.s9yThumb.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
I&#039;m still &lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html&quot;&gt;looking for the best UML editor&lt;/a&gt;.  I&#039;ve just moved to a new project, so it&#039;s time to start the cycle again.  At least now I&#039;ve got a reference of everything that failed in the past!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Today I tried &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.modelsphere.org/&quot;&gt;Open ModelSphere&lt;/a&gt;, another Open Source editor, recommended by one of the commenters in a previous review.  It didn&#039;t work out very well for me.  Let&#039;s see what happened.
&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/358-Rating-UML-Editors-Open-ModelSphere.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Rating UML Editors: Open ModelSphere&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:43:19 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://judebert.com/progress/archives/358-guid.html</guid>
    <category>programming</category>
<category>review</category>
<category>uml</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>Rating UML Editors: ArgoUML</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/337-Rating-UML-Editors-ArgoUML.html</link>
            <category>Programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/337-Rating-UML-Editors-ArgoUML.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://judebert.com/progress/wfwcomment.php?cid=337</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://judebert.com/progress/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=337</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>judebert@judebert.com (Judebert)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;!-- s9ymdb:898 --&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;serendipity_image_left&quot; width=&quot;100&quot; height=&quot;100&quot; style=&quot;float: left; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; src=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/argologo.s9yThumb.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I intend to keep going until I find &lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html&quot;&gt;a UML editor that fits my criteria&lt;/a&gt;.  Onto the burning sands a new challenger comes: &lt;a href=&quot;http://argouml.tigris.org/&quot;&gt;ArgoUML&lt;/a&gt;!  As a developer, I chose the latest beta:  0.28.Beta_4.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I never would have found this if it hadn&#039;t been for &lt;a href=&quot;http://lau-sdl.blogspot.com/2009/02/uml-modeling-tools-reviews.html&quot;&gt;Laurent&#039;s review of UML tools&lt;/a&gt;; I just searched aptitude for anything with UML in the description, and it&#039;s not in the Ubuntu or Debian repositories.  Of course, Laurent just wants to draw diagrams.  I want some more modeling functionality.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Let&#039;s see what ArgoUML has to offer.
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/337-Rating-UML-Editors-ArgoUML.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Rating UML Editors: ArgoUML&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:13:36 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://judebert.com/progress/archives/337-guid.html</guid>
    <category>review</category>
<category>uml</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>UML Editors: Umbrello</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/333-UML-Editors-Umbrello.html</link>
            <category>Programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/333-UML-Editors-Umbrello.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://judebert.com/progress/wfwcomment.php?cid=333</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://judebert.com/progress/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=333</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>judebert@judebert.com (Judebert)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;a  class=&#039;serendipity_image_link&#039;  rel=&#039;lightbox[lightbox_group_entry_333]&#039; href=&#039;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/umbrello.png&#039;&gt;&lt;!-- s9ymdb:892 --&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;serendipity_image_left&quot; width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;79&quot; style=&quot;float: left; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; src=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/umbrello.s9yThumb.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html&quot;&gt;I&#039;m still rating UML editors.&lt;/a&gt; Last time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/332-UML-Editors-Gaphor.html&quot;&gt;Gaphor disappointed me tremendously.&lt;/a&gt;  After two contenders, can &lt;a href=&quot;http://uml.sourceforge.net/&quot;&gt;Umbrello&lt;/a&gt; restore my confidence in Open-Source programmers?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Let&#039;s check that list!
&lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/333-UML-Editors-Umbrello.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;UML Editors: Umbrello&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://judebert.com/progress/archives/333-guid.html</guid>
    <category>review</category>
<category>uml</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>UML Editors: Gaphor</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/332-UML-Editors-Gaphor.html</link>
            <category>Programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/332-UML-Editors-Gaphor.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://judebert.com/progress/wfwcomment.php?cid=332</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://judebert.com/progress/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=332</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>judebert@judebert.com (Judebert)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;a  class=&#039;serendipity_image_link&#039;  rel=&#039;lightbox[lightbox_group_entry_332]&#039; href=&#039;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/gaphor.png&#039;&gt;&lt;!-- s9ymdb:891 --&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;serendipity_image_left&quot; width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;86&quot; style=&quot;float: left; border: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 5px;&quot; src=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/media/screenshots/gaphor.s9yThumb.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html&quot;&gt;I&#039;m still rating UML editors.  Last time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/331-UML-Editors-BOUML.html&quot;&gt;BOUML failed to impress me&lt;/a&gt;.  This time, I&#039;m trying &lt;a href=&quot;http://gaphor.devjavu.com/&quot;&gt;Gaphor&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I thought Gaphor would be terrific, since it&#039;s a Python/GTK project, and therefore native to my system (Ubuntu/Gnome).  Should be easy to modify, too.  And the home page looks good!
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
But Gaphor failed miserably for my purposes.  Let&#039;s see why.
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/332-UML-Editors-Gaphor.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;UML Editors: Gaphor&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://judebert.com/progress/archives/332-guid.html</guid>
    <category>review</category>
<category>uml</category>

</item>
<item>
    <title>Rating UML Editors</title>
    <link>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html</link>
            <category>Programming</category>
    
    <comments>http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://judebert.com/progress/wfwcomment.php?cid=329</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://judebert.com/progress/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=329</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>judebert@judebert.com (Judebert)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;p&gt;
In my job, I go through a Software Design phase for every task I&#039;m given.  That includes drawing a class diagram and a sequence diagram in more-or-less standard &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_Modeling_Language&quot;&gt;UML&lt;/a&gt;.  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Now, I&#039;ve drawn my diagrams in a variety of tools in the past, ranging from the highly specialized to the wildly simplistic (like PowerPoint).  I&#039;ve come to understand the shortcomings of UML modeling tools in general.  And as a good geek, I&#039;m going to write them down.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Rather than being negative, I&#039;m going to write down what I want from a modeling tool.  Then I can use that wishlist as criteria for evaluating the available tools, until I find a good one.  If any such thing exists.
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-Rating-UML-Editors.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Rating UML Editors&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:28:15 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://judebert.com/progress/archives/329-guid.html</guid>
    <category>review</category>
<category>uml</category>

</item>

</channel>
</rss>